Re: [RFC] Big Integer Support

On 14/10/14 18:25, Stas Malyshev wrote: > I don't see why you'd have two code paths. If you need bigints and they > are not there, then you just fail, like with any extension your code > needs and is not installed. If it's there, you just continue working. > All the code existing now doesn't need bigints, and even in the future > most code won't need it. But for some code it would just work like > before, only with unlimited range now. 'bitinteger!' I'm still waiting to see how we handle 'BIGINT' under this rfc since that is something every database driver does need to handle. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk