Re: [RFC] Safe Casting Functions

Hi! >>> - it's probably make sense to implement these function as a new >> opcode(s) in VM >> >> That could be an optimisation later, yes. I note that you’ve added >> function replacement with opcodes for certain commonly-used functions. We >> could make these functions use that. Then they’d still be usable as >> callbacks. If those are opcodes, those rules will require 2/3 majority for acceptance, since those will be the engine rules for type conversion, not just a set of functions. And, of course, the rules not matching the other engine rules for type conversion, sorry for sounding like broken record. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/