Re: [RFC] Readonly Properties

Hi Andrea, I don't have strong opinion about this proposal. It doesn't make any harm to the engine, and it really may speed-up code especially written for read-only properties. On the other hand you introduce new orthogonal to private/protected/public visibility rule, and I'm not sure if this complication is good for language. Why did you disable read-only static methods? (I just didn't get it). Thanks. Dmitry. On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > Good evening once again, > > Here’s another RFC: R > a?¼¶—àþEaPòEhttps://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties > > It proposes, with a working implementation, a modifier for properties that > makes them readable and writeable from different scopes. > > Since I am a big proponent of including specification patches in new RFCs, > I have decided to put my money (or rather, time) where my mouth is and I > have actually written a specification patch before writing an RFC. I would > love to see this become the new standard for RFCs affecting the language. > > If you are curious at all about the behaviour, I suggest perusing the > fairly comprehensive set of twelve tests included in the main patch to > php-src. > > Thanks! > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >