Re: pecl/http RFC

On 31 October 2014 20:47:50 GMT, Will Fitch <willfitch@php.net> wrote: >I don’t want to restart any previous threads, but I’d like to >get/restart the conversation going with the pecl/http RFC: >https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http ><https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http>. > >Recent conversations regarding >https://wiki.php.net/rfc/http-interface ><https://wiki.php.net/rfc/http-interface> make this >approach far more >realistic and approachable. I think discussions regarding the two >should be hashed, and one or the other come out on top. They have >competing aspects, but pecl/http has a proven and well-known interface. > It’s high-time, at the very least, that it be considered for core. Has anyone looked at ways of tweaking pecl/http to work nicely with PSR-7? For instance, it would be a shame if an adapter were needed to make http\Message implement Psr\Http\Message\MessageInterface when they are so close in intent. On the other hand, I guess declaring the compatibility would require baking the interface itself into the core/extension, which might be unpopular.