Re: PHP RFC: Introduce session_start() options - read_only, unsafe_lock, lazy_write and lazy_destroy
| From: | Ferenc Kovacs | Date: | Thu, 06 Nov 2014 06:28:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP RFC: Introduce session_start() options - read_only, unsafe_lock, lazy_write and lazy_destroy | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-78783@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2014.11.06. 7:10 ezt írta ("Yasuo Ohgaki" <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>):
>
> Hi all,
>
> The RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/session-lock-ini was accepted
> and the
> patch for this was ready to merge, but it wasn't merged to 5.6 by mistake..
>
> The patch is this.
>
> https://github.com/yohgaki/php-src/compare/PHP-5.6-rfc-session-lock
> (It's been a while and it has to be updated for current code)
>
> I may update the patch and merge, but question is which branch should be,
> 5.6.3, 5.6.4, or master?
>
> I need comments from RM.
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Yasuo Ohgaki
> yohgaki@ohgaki.net
As I mentioned in my mail yesterday, I would prefer delaying this for the
next minor/major version (and reverting the write short circuit from 5.6).
But putting that aside, I think it would make sense addressing the points
brought up by Andrej regarding this rfc.
Ps: and dont forget/ignore that originally only the read only/lazy write
parts were accepted, the other two proposals did not.