Re: [VOTE][RFC] Safe Casting Functions

> On 26 Nov 2014, at 23:00, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So far only 15 people have voted, that’s very low for this kind of RFC. >> >> I’m tempted to extend voting for another week. It’s not likely to >> change the outcome, but it would hopefully mean more people vote. > > I don't know if it would make a difference here, but I wonder if it would be sensible to > add an "abstain" option in votes? That way, someone who has considered an RFC but not > formed a strong opinion either way could register that fact. This could even be paired with the > notion of a "quorum", i.e. a minimum vote count demonstrating that the outcome of the vote > is not the accidental result of "missing" votes, say because several people happened to be > on holiday or busy. That sounds like a very good idea to me, I, for one, would be happy if this was implemented. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/