Re: [RFC] Static classes (Was Abstract final classes)
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:14:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Static classes (Was Abstract final classes) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-79344@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On 1 Dec 2014, at 16:12, Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>> Yes, they’re a simple addition, but I still think they’re the wrong
>> solution to the problem. We shouldn’t force people to use classes for
>> simple collections of functions. People have wanted function
>> autoloading for years. I say it’s high time we add that.
>
> Maybe <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/function_autoloading>
> should be reopened?
Perhaps. I did want to revive that RFC, but I disliked Anthony’s approach to implementing it (new
set of functions, namespaced) and the patch wasn’t for phpng.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/