AW: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Nullsafe calls

From: Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:17:00 +0000
Subject: AW: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Nullsafe calls
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-79525@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Josh Watzman [mailto:jwatzman@fb.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014 00:08 > An: PHP internals > Betreff: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Nullsafe calls > > Hey internals! A useful feature that Hack picked up in the last few months are "nullsafe > calls", a way of propagating failure > forward in a series of chained method calls to the end of the whole computation, getting rid of > a lot of the boilerplate in the > middle. I think the feature would be a good one for PHP as well, so I'm submitting this > RFC to add it -- you can see the RFC > itself for a full discussion of the motivation for the feature, as well as the feature itself: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/nullsafe_calls > > Josh Watzman > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.php.net/unsub.php First of all, I like the RFC, I think as well that it is a useful feature for PHP and I already have it on my wish list ;) Yet, either I misunderstand the section about short circuiting or I propose to change the behaviour. "If $obj is null, when $obj?->foo(..) executes, the arguments will still be evaluated." IMO that is wrong. It should not evaluate the arguments since the nullsafe operator (sometimes called "safe navigation" operator in other languages - which is the better wording IMO, maybe change it? But that is just a detail) is just syntactic sugar for making the call only if $bj is not null. So the following: $obj = null; $obj?->foo($a, $b); should be the same as $obj = null; If($obj !== null){ $obj->foo($a, $b); } hence PHP will not complain that $a and $b where not defined.

« previous php.internals (#79525) next »