Re: Calling methods of parent/ancestor classes in PHP5
| From: | Ferdinand Beyer | Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:51:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Calling methods of parent/ancestor classes in PHP5 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-7979@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 18 Feb 2004 at 21:02, Michael Walter wrote:
> This is rather wrong - one of C++' main strengths is that it allows
> multiple paradigms of programming (procedural, object-oriented,
generic,
> generative, functional, ...) which can also be mixed etc. Instead of
> ideologically focusing on only one paradigm (as Java seems/ed to
try
> to), it provides a multitude of possibilities to tackle a problem and
> design a solution.
C++ is very flexible, yes. But everytime I came in touch with C++ the
convention was to "think object-oriented" and use OOP as much as
possible: MFC programming, for example. Some books I read
showed up examples of "bad style" C++ programming (essentially
procedural, C-like code) and "the correct way" (object-oriented). I'm
sure you are much more experienced than me so maybe I'm wrong
here.
Don't you see a difference in the role and power of OOP in PHP and
other languages like C++ or Java?!
But let's get back to the thread's topic: I only said that re-assigning
$this is a bad. In fact it does not even matter what language I
consider to be OO...
--
Ferdinand Beyer
<fb@fbeyer.com>