Re: About SUCCESS/FAILURE
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Thu, 25 Dec 2014 04:06:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: About SUCCESS/FAILURE | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-79930@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On 24 Dec 2014, at 23:53, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Johannes Schlüter
> <johannes@schlueters.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-12-24 at 11:13 -0700, Levi Morrison wrote:
>>
>>> I'm asking for specific things. The reason is that some API's do a
>>> non-zero error code; the fact that they are negative is a detail that
>>> we should not need to care about.
>>
>> My guess is that positive values more often might have a meaning ("5
>> items changed", "address 0x1234") whereas negative values less often
>> have a meaning. Also passing -1 as parameter is more often invalid. Thus
>> passing -1 is making debug output look more suspicious.
>>
>> (while there are cases where -1 is valid, see recent famous pid
>> = fork(); /* ... */ kill(pid, SIGKILL); issue)
>
> I don't think this is the same use case as SUCCESS and FAILURE. Many
> functions have an out parameter which is only valid when the returned
> value is SUCCESS. This is not the same thing as an API which returns
> an integer and just happen to embed error state in the negative range.
> Notably, it doesn't make sense to do
strpos() == SUCCESS
> to check
> success; these are different cases. My question is specifically
> directed at the ones that use SUCCESS and FAILURE: which ones require
> FAILURE to be negative instead of the normal UNIX-ism of non-zero?
>
> For the record I am in favor of an enum such as zend_status or
> some
> other name which indicates whether an operation succeeded or not for
> the reasons already cited in this thread. I just don't see why FAILURE
> needs to be negative and want to know why this is the case.
Hi Levi,
Again, I think the reason FAILURE is -1 is for consistency with other functions which use negative
return values on error. Some functions return negative error codes, others just -1. Some functions
return useful positive values, others just 0. But the idea is that all functions return a negative
number on error, so you can use if (foo() < 0) to check for errors. That’s the point of making
FAILURE be -1, AIUI. It makes it consistent with other things, like fork() or strpos().
Thanks.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/