RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Default parent constructors RFC
| From: | François Laupretre | Date: | Sun, 11 Jan 2015 04:50:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Default parent constructors RFC | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-80352@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> De : Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:smalyshev@gmail.com]
>
> TLDR: this RFC would make a call to parent::__construct() succeed (as in
> "not produce a fatal error") even if the parent class does not define a
> ctor. Same for __destruct and __clone. The motivation for it is in the
> RFC and here: https://php100.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/default-
> constructors/
+1.
Considering implicit empty constructors and destructors is totally intuitive and should have been
done a long time ago.
For __clone, no opinion as I never used it.
François