Re: [RFC][Vote] Return Types
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:42:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][Vote] Return Types | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-80711@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Pierre and Levi,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
> > Hi Simon and Levi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Simon J Welsh <simon@welsh.co.nz>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The tests have it after the use():
> >>
>
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/997/files#diff-e306c6e99612ba59b00a4fe435b287e5R9
> >>
> >> This was discussed in depth a couple of times in the related threads.
> >>
> >
> > Thank you for the information. It should be in the RFC. IMHO.
> > I feels natural to have type spec after function parameter definition
> > rather than
> > after "use".
>
> Please do not change the RFC during votes phase, or re start it.
>
> If many of the voters feel like they were voted on something different
> of what is being discussed here, it may be a good thing to restart it.
> However I think we all understood it as it is described in this
> thread. Let update it after the votes or for the docs.
Sounds good to me.
Let's update the RFC after vote.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net