Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Removal of dead SAPIs and extensions
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2015 05:26:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Removal of dead SAPIs and extensions | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-80855@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> Hi Anatol,
>
> Despite of this, we also have few extensions not converted to PHP7 yet -
>
> https://wiki.php.net/phpng#unsupported_extensions_not_converted_yet
>
> 3 of them related to MSSQL, 2 to Oracle and one to Interbase. the last one
> is partially converted (may be compiled), but it's so ugly, so it won't work
> without serious redesign (I'm not sure how it worked in php-5).
Seriously I would also like to see all three in pecl. I am not saying
that they are not used nor maintained but a more flexible releases and
leave more options to the maintainer(s) could actually help. The main
problem here is the barrier to get a dev environment up and working,
quite high, especially for the 1st two. Interbase is easier but is a
niche server, so any kind of fixes or changes tightly related to how
this DB works require more than the usual suspects like pgsql, mysql
or sqlite.
I also do not like to use pecl as a cemetery for dead cows. After this
RFC, if some choices are actually accepted, let discuss how to deal
with that, from a pecl.php.net point of view. I would rather have them
marked dead and to do not appear in default search, a big warning on
install should be displayed as well (that's something I can take of if
desired).
Maybe change the RFC title to reflect both kind of moves and them to the list.
Cheers,
Pierre