Re: in Operator

From: Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:27:59 +0000
Subject: Re: in Operator
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-80878@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Mike, Back to the subject,: > It is indeed different but ever so slightly, a for loop in this case cannot handle a single > argument of true and would cause a parse error. > Therefore for ("PHP" in ["PHP, "C", "Java"]) could be > handled differently. Again, my main point is that due to other languages the in > operator itself also correlates to for ($var in $container), I understand having an additional > RFC but this is indeed the place for > discussion of such things. Agree, but maybe a RFC for "in" operator and a follow up RFC to allow "in" on "for" context could be a win/win here as long as one feature doesn't block each other? 2015-01-20 11:10 GMT-03:00 Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com>: > Mike, > >> Also FYI - in the future please try not to top post and instead post under where you are >> commenting as it makes it more difficult for >> people coming later to the thread to see the scope of the conversation. > > Thanks for the tip! I read to "do not top post" on the guidelines but > had no clue what it meant until now xD

« previous php.internals (#80878) next »