Re: Re: cvs: php4 /ext/standard file.c

From: Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 22:20:08 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: php4 /ext/standard file.c
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-813@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> I had the same reaction when I saw this but ultimately decided to leave it > in. > > (A) Hopefully sterling had a reason for putting it in in the first place :) Don't be too sure. > (B) include_path typically starts with a '.' making this a non-issue. Many places this is not the case as it is actually a rather nasty performance problem. For really performance-sensitive sites you should be using: include './foo.inc'; if you want to include from the current dir and let the include_path pick up any of the non-relative includes, but make sure that the first path in your include_path is where the bulk of these will come from. It is very common to have a shared code library stored somewhere and to point your include_path at that. eg. PEAR. If you put '.' first in your include_path then every single include for a file in that library is going to do a useless stat() in the current directory first. > (C) fopen($filename, 'w', true) is possible and can cause exactly the same > potential problem anyway. That's true, and I'd be inclined to turn off include_path on a 'w' or 'w+', but then we'd be parsing the mode and that's pretty nasty, so I guess I am +0 on this as well. -Rasmus

« previous php.internals (#813) next »