Re: What do we need strict scalar type hints for?

Hi Dmitry, On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > The idea of that RFC was an ability to have zero-cost assert(). > > DbC is a much more bigger feature, it is interesting, but requires > significant work. Type check and DbC integration would require significant work, I guess. If you say so, it is. How about simple in{}, out{} block? I expect it's much simpler. Injecting in{} and out{} block code to before/after execute() something like this. If execute() is replaceable as before, then we may have two execute() for production and development. There will be zero performance cost hopefully. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net