Re: scalar type hints
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Mon, 09 Feb 2015 03:28:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: scalar type hints | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-82213@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Matt and all,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Matt Parker <matt@lamplightdb.co.uk> wrote:
> The first question was 'Did you read the RFC' and the second 'Would
> you like the RFC to
> pass'. I set it up Friday morning (GMT) and tweeted it around a bit
> (I have a grand total
> of 58 followers on twitter). So this relates to version 0.3
>
> As of now, 306 people have responded, a lot more than I anticipated.
> 84% said they read
> the RFC; > 83% would like it to pass (full responses here:
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-Q8KRRZV7/, the survey
> itself here:
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/SDB2V6Z).
>
They don't know about DbC discussion probably.
I thought we were no where near to implement DbC, so I was willing to vote
+1 initially.
However, DbC is coming close!
DbC brings much more flexibility, strict/loose constraints, performance,
security, better documentation and more.
DbC suitable for weakly typed PHP perfectly.
Therefore, I'm holding my vote now.
I hope everyone have an attention to DbC and consider thoughtfully.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net