Re: Spaceship operator RFC
| From: | Matteo Beccati | Date: | Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:54:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Spaceship operator RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-82795@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Stas!
A bit of flexibility surely doesn't hurt, indeed. I just thought it was worth to raise it. I personally have no objections. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/About your question, I don't know... treating a cancelled voting result as if it wasn't might be setting a weird precedent, even though it was so close to the end and had an overwhelming majority.The only reason it was cancelled because of Andrea quitting, and with one day left result is pretty clear. Running the same vote again with 4:1 for sounds pointless to me. If it was a close one then fine, but it's not really close. If anybody would want to abuse this in the future as a precedent for gaming the system, we'll deal with it then appropriately, I'm sure.