Re: RFC: Expectations
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:03:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Expectations | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-82802@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Martin Jansen <martin@divbyzero.net> wrote:
> On 16.02.15 10:37, Joe Watkins wrote:
> > Please review the RFC, and provide feedback, if there are no strong
> > objections we will go ahead with a vote when the patch is ready, in the
> > coming days.
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/expectations
>
> I like it. But why do those two INI settings use different "namespaces"?
> Why not call zend.assertions something like assert.enable? Also I'm
> wondering if the default value for zend.assertions should better be 0?
It requires compiler switch. If we don't have INI, then there should
declare(), but
it requires script modification to enable/disable. It just does not work.
That's the reason why.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net