Re: [RFC-Discuss] Scalar Type Declarations v0.5

Albert, On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Albert Casademont Filella <albertcasademont@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Anthony! > > Thanks for bringing this up again. I am asking you the same I asked Andrea 2 > weeks ago on Twitter: make it a triple option vote please. She didn't want > to do it, hope you do! This way you eliminate the neverending discussion > about weak vs strict, let the votes decide and see who really prefers weak > type hinting only and who prefers the stricter way, both camps will have an > option to vote. > > So I propose 3 voting options: Yes (strict), Yes (weak), No. The Yes votes > combined need 2/3 of the votes. Then a simple majority of 50%+1 between the > different Yes votes is needed. Thanks for the feedback. I have added it to the discussion points: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/scalar_type_hints_v5#this_proposal_should_have_multiple_vote_options The text: This is not a two-part proposal. The proposal is of a unified system that was designed to work together. As such, neither part (weak-only or strict-only) is designed to stand on its own without the other part. Therefore, it only makes sense to vote on this proposal as a whole. Therefore, the voting options this RFC will present will be: Yes and No. Thanks, Anthony