Re: [VOTE] Expectations

On 19 February 2015 at 15:45, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > Still, no announce for a discussion about this specific RFC. And > really, the content of the RFC is almost empty, pointing to the ML > archive is really not the right way :) There was an RFC announce thread 3 days ago. I agree 3 days is a short period of time, but the announce thread existed. Maybe it was a reply to DbC with a changed subject and your mail client didn't show it as new? I don't know, there was definitely a thread though. On 19 February 2015 at 16:06, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > I like the concept and idea but still not sure about the custom > exception vs AssertException. Looking at the implementation, it seems that the custom exception still has to descend from AssertException https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1088/files#diff-232f2dffbb06c0b6004724d8a498e7e7R248 That seems like a good restriction to me. You can still catch everything with AssertException but you can make it more specific if you want.