Re: Using Other Channels (was Scalar Type Declarations v0.5)

Zeev, Based on Sara's clarification in this thread, I owe you a formal apology. I interpreted something she said incorrectly, which was then compounded by messages in private and on-list this morning. I then attributed both of you qualities and motives that have been proven false. For this, I am sorry for any implication or direct acquisition that I made against you. I do believe that the best way forward is parallel proposals, as I believe that we have different goals. So I look forward to seeing yours, and will continue forward with mine. Hopefully this differing of opinion can be rectified before too long. Thanks, Anthony On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmaxell@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:04 PM >> To: Zeev Suraski >> Cc: internals@lists.php.net >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Using Other Channels (was Scalar Type Declarations >> v0.5) >> >> Zeev, >> >> That was a quote directly from Sara in a public chat room. It wasn't >> "someone else". >> >> So it seems like there was a failure in communication if you felt that it >> was >> 100% polite, and she described it as "not-so-politely". > > Ouch. I'm really not sure why she felt that way. I'll follow up with her > to try and understand. > >> Then that's great! But let's find that out by voting rather than guessing, >> and >> rather than politicking. Let's let two competing proposals go head to >> head. > > I'd rather find out by first discussing the alternative, rather than just > moving ahead to a revote - especially a revote that was placed on a > shortened timeline - given the importance of this RFC. But as you clearly > disagree, it's your call to make and I respect that. > > Zeev