Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Parameter skipping RFC

Hi! > I see a LOT of "no" votes against this RFC but can't find the thread > outlining the reasoning for such resistence. I think my attempts to explain that this was a step towards named params, not a contradiction with them, failed - people read it, say "we understood it" and the say "no, we don't want it, we want named params instead!". Well, let's hope somebody (not me) writes a patch for named params instead. In the meantime, 7.0 will have neither. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com