Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Reliable user-land CSPRNG
| From: | Pádraic Brady | Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:54:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Reliable user-land CSPRNG | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-83712@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Yasuo,
On 24 February 2015 at 22:08, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
> Random bytes is better. People would use it for IV or like with the
> size of IV. If we use string, users loose effective bits.
Suggestion was for an additional function, so random_bytes() would
still be there ;).
Paddy
--
Pádraic Brady
http://blog.astrumfutura.com
http://www.survivethedeepend.com