Re: [RFC] Design by Contract - Vote only RFC
| From: | Leigh | Date: | Sun, 01 Mar 2015 03:53:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Design by Contract - Vote only RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-84093@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 1 March 2015 at 03:32, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see why the first one needs any vote. It is supposed to be
> implemented as an extension, so why not go and implement an extension,
> and put it in PECL, and then propose it for core inclusion, if it proves
> popular?
Agree
> As for the second one, do we really need the syntax change that would
> just move asserts to before { instead of after? If we already have
> zero-cost asserts, why just not use them?
Agree
@yasuo. The votes are closed.