Re: Request Feedback for Instance Variable Sugar RFC
| From: | Benoit Schildknecht | Date: | Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:28:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Request Feedback for Instance Variable Sugar RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-84481@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
I think your idea is good.
Le Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:11:01 +0100, Shawn McCool <shawn@heybigname.com> a écrit:
There's a cultural disposition against re-purposing a symbol from one major version to the next. Let's consider that as fact and move on. If I wanted to provide syntactic sugar to replace a symbol with $this-> so that our code can become more expressive if we choose to use it, how would you recommend implementing that? @ is not going to be a _real_ option. But what about.. :number = $number; :add(:number, $number); or some other character?: is already used for ternary expression, it will confuse people as well as softwares and parsing scripts. The RFC would certainly be rejected in the voting phase. I would recommend using § or £. I don't think they are actually used, and they are quite easy to remember. Regards.