RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Make empty() a Variadic

From: Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:07:42 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Make empty() a Variadic
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-84639@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Thomas Punt wrote: > Hey PHP Internals, > > So there hasn't been much discussion on this RFC, and yet a lot of people have > voted -1 on it. This is a little disappointing because I'm not entirely sure why > people are against it - and no one seems to want to debate it either. IMO, because it's not obvious whether it is *all* empty, or *atleast one* empty. The same argument we had before, when we expanded isset() to be variadic. We had the same discussion then, resulting on keeping empty() as it is. One discussion 11 years ago: http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=109836951711930 I can't find the discussion prior to that though. cheers, Derick

« previous php.internals (#84639) next »