Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Strict Argument Count

On 13/03/15 09:02, Patrick ALLAERT wrote: > It also depends on your perception of E_STRICT. This level has been > introduced in 5.0 without being part of E_ALL in order to, among other > things, avoid too much pain in the *** while migrating from 4.x to 5.x. > As of 5.4, E_ALL contains E_STRICT and the difference between E_STRICT > and E_NOTICE/E_WARNING is certainly not in terms of severity. > Using an undefined variable or property => notice. > Trying to get property of non-object => notice. > Use of undefined constant => notice > > For this reason, I think we should use the standard notice/warning/error > levels as much as possible. You may take a look at Nikita's "Reclassify > E_STRICT RFC" for more info about it. > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/__reclassify_e_strict > <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict> I think the main point here is just like the PHP4->5 conversion path, SOME areas that need upgrading should be flagged by default while others should be able to be hidden until they need to be addressed. Perhaps E_STRICT7 off by default, but if all of the 4->5 conversion stuff is now reclassified then E_STRICT should be available to serve the same purpose it did back then? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk