Re: static constructor

Am 15.03.2015 um 12:35 schrieb Crypto Compress: > You should reread your mails and keep insults to yourself: > >> as already discussed several times > >> ppl, who doesn't understand > >> some beginner who is doing such horiffic code > >> maybe think more about what he is doing > >> doing 15 years of OOP-programming > >> I never had the need > >> "valid" usage > >> as I explained > >> direct static binding > >> PHP is as intelligent > > Bye! Hi Crypto Compress, Sorry those shouldn't be any kind of insult! If you understand those as an insult I really apologize for that! Maybe I was a bit to hard at argue. Nothing else was my intention, then a discussion about the arguments. And when writing about beginner ppl doing horrific code I didn't meant it personaly to someone special, I'll just tried to take count about Rowans argument, that beginners will have extremly problems with this static context. > And PHP is as intelligent, I really think PHP is a very smart language already and I tried to implicit, that it is working already correctly on the problem you have told. As a conclusion I will reread my mails in future, and try to improve my sometime really poor English, and think about everything twice, to avoid more misunderstandings on my argues Sorry again! -- DerOetzi -- DerOetzi