Re: [RFC][VOTE] In Operator
| From: | Marco Pivetta | Date: | Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:16:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][VOTE] In Operator | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-84959@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Niklas,
On 15 March 2015 at 19:31, Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> wrote:
> Morning,
>
> I just opened the vote for the in operator, you can find the RFC here:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/in_operator
> Vote will be open for two weeks, counting from today.
>
> Regards, Niklas
>
I just wanted to clarify on my "no" vote, and the reason for it is that we
have perfectly functional internal as well as userland implementations of
array/Traversable search operations.
Syntactic sugar won't really make things easier when adopting the language,
and I don't like this sort of additional cognitive load either.
In short, I stand firm on my "if you can implement it in userland, don't
implement it in the language" idea.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/