Re: [RFC][VOTE] Strict Argument Count On Function Calls
| From: | Simon Schick | Date: | Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:20:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][VOTE] Strict Argument Count On Function Calls | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-85116@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi, all
At first, Thanks for all your work put in here, Marcio. It gave me a new
hint for a possible code-failure.
FYI: PhpStorm lately added an inspector for that. Glad to see that move
after I heard that the RFC won't pass.
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/WI-14692
Bye,
Simon
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had no time to reply all emails since yesterday, but right now we are
> having a voting with 2 "yes" votes vs 16 "no" votes.
>
> I think we all agree that the RFC won't pass and I'm withdrawing the RFC
> for the following reasons:
>
> 1. The sooner we end the voting period the better for the PHP time line.
> Since there is no motives to think the voting will flip, the best
> attitude
> seems to be a withdraw.
> 2. We are having a lot of simultaneous voting right now and some voters
> care to read all the RFCs. The proposed RFC is long, requires testing
> etc.
> As it was already rejected, removing it from the list of RFCs in voting
> phase might be beneficial to the voting process as it reduces the RFC
> overload we are having because of the feature freeze.
> 3. Looking at the ML, there are many controversial points that were
> raised, a lot of them since yesterday. Weather they are debatable or
> not,
> all this controversy during voting phases is a bad thing (look at the
> scalar type hints drama we had). So it's better to just put this to end
> and
> move on.
>
> Thanks for the votes, I'll try to reply to the emails anyway whenever
> necessary :)
> PS: I don't intend to propose this RFC again in the future as I already
> have other more important RFCs planned for PHP 7.1
>
> Thanks,
> Márcio
>