Re: Vote process change proposal

Hi! > This would block voting "lobbying" in various social channels based on > possible > outcomes, and would allow voting to run its course unaltered. The people Why we want to block it? What's wrong in convincing people that your idea is OK (or that it's not OK, for that matter)? Isn't it kind of the whole point of discussing it? > want to share their vote option, can still do that in the mailing list > where some already > justify their votes. So now parallel to voting we get threads announcing everybody's votes. Yay, more noise! Or, even worse, given current tendencies, somebody submits a proposal, couple of people say "yeah good idea", then vote happens and somehow there's 30 "no" votes without any explanation - and without possibility to fix it since by the time the proposer knows it the proposal is already declined. It wouldn't be very encouraging to submit RFCs with such process. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com