Re: Inconsistencies in callable, call_user_func and direct variable calls
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:43:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Inconsistencies in callable, call_user_func and direct variable calls | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-85246@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Rowan,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 19/03/2015 20:50, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Sebastian B.-Hagensen <
>> sbj.ml.read@gmail.com <U%„»ŸYÏ
ä—¹ž
>> mailto:sbj.ml.read@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> 2015-03-19 12:51 GMT+01:00 Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net
>> <mailto:yohgaki@ohgaki.net>>:
>> > Distinguishing array and callable is problematic.
>> > Array callable is better to be deprecated in the long run. IMHO.
>>
>> Then how would you write an callback containing an already
>> constructed object?
>> $a = [$object, 'method'];
>>
>> The alternative is unnecessarily cumbersome:
>> $a = function($methodArg1, $methodArg2) use($object) { return
>> $object->method($methodArg1, $methodArg2); };
>>
>>
>> I'm not proposing deprecate it soon, but in the long run.
>> It will need a decade to deprecate it.
>>
>
> It is not time that is needed, but an alternative way of expressing "use
> this instance method as a callback", such as those discussed elsewhere in
> the thread.
I replied how it could be deprecated.
I'm not commenting for it, but the deprecation discussion.
You cannot restrict discussion to what you would want, can it?
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net