Re: PDO Oracle driver
| From: | Peter Cowburn | Date: | Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:34:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PDO Oracle driver | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.doc php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-85892@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 22 April 2015 at 11:24, Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com> wrote:
> cc-ing doc list
>
> On 22 April 2015 at 10:40, Stelian Mocanita <stelian.mocanita@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello internals,
>>
>> I would like to ask what on your thoughts on removing the Oracle drive for
>> PDO from the documentation (http://us1.php.net/manual/en/ref.pdo-oci.php)
>> at least since it's been experimental for a long time now, and it has long
>> standing open bugs, such as:
>>
>
From the documentation point of view:
Just because an extension is considered experimental, or indeed
unmaintained, is no reason to remove the extension from the manual. We
have a bunch of extensions marked as experimental [1] or dead [2] and I
don't see why pdo_oci should be any different.
>
>> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=37706
>> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46728
>> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60994
>>
>> I know that the extension is marked as experimental already but based on
>> the current status, it's not even that and a significant amount of basic
>> functionality is broken.
>>
>
Let's mark the extension as "dead" in the manual, as we do with other dead
extensions.
>
>> Regards,
>> Stelian
>>
>
>
[1] bcompiler, blenc, dbplus, haru, memtrack, ming, paradox, pdo_4d,
pdo_oci, sca, sdodasrel, spl_types, svn, swish, vpopmail, xmlrpc
[2] classkit, fam, fdf, iisfunc, msession, nis, session_pgsql