Re: Reserve even more type hints RFC
| From: | Christoph Becker | Date: | Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:59:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Reserve even more type hints RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-86089@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Christoph Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
>> I've noticed that the "Reserve Even More Types in PHP 7" RFC[1] has been
>> moved to "Process and Policy" with the comment "needs no impl".
>
> I've moved the RFC based on Sara's mail in the voting thread [1]. Quoting:
>
>> There's no language in the RFC about
>> actually throwing errors or other code-breaking behavior. Therefore,
>> even should all of them pass, it does *NOT* mean that your code using
>> these names suddenly stops working on PHP7. It means that you have
>> been warned that using the names of intrinsics is a bad idea, and that
>> the language reserves the /right/ to make doing so an error at some
>> point in the future.
>
> I also know that at least some of the votes were cast under the assumption
> that this is just a "documentation" reservation, as opposed to throwing
> errors.
Thanks for the explanation. I must have missed (or simply forgotten
about) this mail. The voters have probably more carefully followed the
discussion, so enforcing the reservation by convention has been part of
the decision.
> [1]: http://markmail.org/message/3zehjdlvuhv5sosq
--
Christoph M. Becker