Re: Add support $object::class

> $object is not guaranteed to be an object, it could be anything (int, > string, etc) or nothing (null). using ::class for a variable, I'd argue, > makes for less consistency. What would the replacement be for non-object > variables? An error, exception, or false, or string type? At least in > "Bar::class", you'll always get a string representation of what the fully > qualified class name resolves to. $scalar::class === gettype($scalar) $object::class === get_class($object) > That said, the argument could be made that since static::class, self::class, > and parent::class fall into the same category of potential runtime > resolutions that $object::class too should be supported. +1