RE: [INTERNALS-WIN] Re: [PHP-DEV] Q: What is the Config.w32 equivalent of PHP_ADD_MAKEFILE_FRAGMENT?

From: Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:17:59 +0000
Subject: RE: [INTERNALS-WIN] Re: [PHP-DEV] Q: What is the Config.w32 equivalent of PHP_ADD_MAKEFILE_FRAGMENT?
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals php.internals.win 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-86392@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
-----Original Message----- > From: Anatol Belski [mailto:anatol.php@belski.net] [...] > Can you please share what exactly you need it to do? Like the > command sequence or alike, maybe there is already a way to do that. I need to run the $(MC) command, with the '-um' option, which will create ETW message macros & binary resources. The output is a .h, a .rc and a couple of .BIN files. e.g.: $(MC) -um -e h -h ..\pecl\wincache -r ..\pecl\wincache wincache_etw.man I'm working around the lack of a fragment by running the $(MC) command by hand, an checking in the results to the pecl\wincache directory, and hand-hacking the template.rc to #include the resulting wincache_etw.rc. It kinda works, but it would be better if the building of the ETW resources was automatic with make/nmake. Even better would be to put the rendered .h, .rc & .bin files in the same directory as the .obj's, so they could be cleaned up. The problem there is no way to pass an include directory arg (-I<dir>) to the $(RC) command used for template.rc. Thx! --E.

« previous php.internals (#86392) next »