Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Short Closures
| From: | Bob Weinand | Date: | Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:22:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Short Closures | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-88148@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> Am 10.09.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Björn Larsson <bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com>:
>
> Den 2015-09-03 kl. 00:48, skrev Rowan Collins:
>> Amendment 3. Make the parentheses around the argument list mandatory so that (if Amendment
>> 1 is also adopted) there is only a single variant of the syntax, namely "( param list ) ~>
>> expression".
>>
> Any plans to incorporate any of the amendments above in the RFC?
> Personally I favour amendment 3. One of your examples would be:
> functionreduce(callable $fn){
> return($initial)~>($input)~>{
> $accumulator=$initial;
> foreach($inputas$value){
> $accumulator=$fn($accumulator,$value);
> }
> return$accumulator;};
> }
>
> Or maybe I'm just overly familiar having function arguments
> within parenthesis ;)
>
> Regards, //Björn Larsson
You are probably just very familiar with them ;-)
It totally isn't unusual to have that (for languages allowing untyped params), see:
Javascript (ES6)
Hack
C#
(There probably are more, I just can recall these three off my head)
So, I think this very much falls under personal preference.
Bob