Re: Password_hash salt generation refactor
| From: | Anthony Ferrara | Date: | Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:57:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Password_hash salt generation refactor | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-89016@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
All,
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net> wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmaxell@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:00 AM
>> To: internals@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Password_hash salt generation refactor
>>
>> All,
>>
>> With PHP 7 comes random_bytes and random_int. This duplicates some of
>> the logic internally that password_hash uses to generate its salt.
>>
>> I would like to refactor this to unify generation. I've opened a PR against
>> master: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1585
>>
>> I don't feel comfortable pulling against 7 this far into RC status.
>> Perhaps wait until after it goes gold? Or should this target 7.1? It's not a big
>> deal in either direction. Though it does add a side-effect, where if it can't
>> gather enough entropy it will throw an exception and return failure (where
>> prior it would simply make a "best effort".
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
> As much as it could be an improvement of the password_hash(), one would better avoid any
> behavior change at this stage. I was thinking about it and came to an idea that maybe could work for
> 7.0 - one should just make php_random_bytes() that side effect free.
>
> Could php_random_bytes() be extended with a flag that would tell exceptions to pass? Or maybe
> exceptions could be moved out from the php_random_bytes() and thrown directly in the new functions
> that was undergoing the RFC but not password_hash() ? I'd be actually for the second variant.
>
> That ways FAILURE would be returned, but a decision about what to do about it would be made
> outside. IMHO it were also useful as the API is intended to be exported. So for the cases where
> php_random_bytes() came to use as a library function outside immediate PHP userspace (for example in
> SAPI), it should not throw exceptions from itself.
>
> Do this suggestions sound eligible?
I have created a PR for this: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1614
It changes the public API of the internal php_random_bytes function to
have a third "should_throw" parameter, as well as defining two macros:
php_random_bytes_throw(dest, len) and php_random_bytes_silent(dest,
len).
If this looks acceptable, it can be pulled into 7.0, and then the move
for password_hash can be done at a later date.
Thanks
Anthony