Re: is_readable stricter than it should be (PHP5 only?)

From: Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 02:49:41 +0000
Subject: Re: is_readable stricter than it should be (PHP5 only?)
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-8906@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Dear Marcus: > most probably the file rights prevent the web server from reading it. As I mentioned: "PHP actually *can* read the file" -- and even though I haven't explicitly said, most obviously I implied: from the web server. > The function works as expected in 4.3.6rc as well as php5. As I mentioned: no, it does not work as expected, unfortunately, at least in PHP5. > Apart from that this is neither a bug list nor a support list. I see. So you mean one cannot ask questions regarding potential PHP implementation problems here? What then? Besides, let me tell you that I myself had this concern, so two weeks ago I posted a question here titled "PHP5: where to go with PHP5 betatesting feedback?" (because I simply could not find a hint of the correct answer to that question in the available PHP docs...). Nobody replied. Then, monitoring the postings here I found probably this might still be a place for such things, considering that the people, who are most interested in such issues -- the PHP developers -- are concentrated here quite densely... Regards, Szabolcs > Saturday, April 3, 2004, 1:56:11 AM, you wrote: > > > Tampering with a coWiki (www.cowiki.org) plugin, I noticed that > > is_readable() returns false, when PHP actually *can* read the file. > > (Just commented out an "if (!is_readable($sRealPath))" and then > > all went fine, the plugin now can read the files...) > > > Is there a known reason for or has anoyone bumped into this? (Just > > asking so I can decide if I should put some efforts to investigating > > this.) > > > Thanks, > > Sz. > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Marcus mailto:helly@php.net > >

« previous php.internals (#8906) next »