Re: is_readable stricter than it should be (PHP5 only?)
| From: | Luna Kid | Date: | Sat, 03 Apr 2004 02:49:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: is_readable stricter than it should be (PHP5 only?) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-8906@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Dear Marcus:
> most probably the file rights prevent the web server from reading it.
As I mentioned: "PHP actually *can* read the file" -- and even though I
haven't explicitly said, most obviously I implied: from the web server.
> The function works as expected in 4.3.6rc as well as php5.
As I mentioned: no, it does not work as expected, unfortunately, at least in PHP5.
> Apart from that this is neither a bug list nor a support list.
I see. So you mean one cannot ask questions regarding potential PHP
implementation problems here? What then? Besides, let me tell you that I
myself had this concern, so two weeks ago I posted a question here titled
"PHP5: where to go with PHP5 betatesting feedback?" (because I simply
could not find a hint of the correct answer to that question in the available
PHP docs...). Nobody replied. Then, monitoring the postings here I found
probably this might still be a place for such things, considering that the
people, who are most interested in such issues -- the PHP developers
-- are concentrated here quite densely...
Regards,
Szabolcs
> Saturday, April 3, 2004, 1:56:11 AM, you wrote:
>
> > Tampering with a coWiki (www.cowiki.org) plugin, I noticed that
> > is_readable() returns false, when PHP actually *can* read the file.
> > (Just commented out an "if (!is_readable($sRealPath))" and then
> > all went fine, the plugin now can read the files...)
>
> > Is there a known reason for or has anoyone bumped into this? (Just
> > asking so I can decide if I should put some efforts to investigating
> > this.)
>
> > Thanks,
> > Sz.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Marcus mailto:helly@php.net
>
>