Re: RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline

Zeev, On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmaxell@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:09 PM >> To: Zeev Suraski >> Cc: PHP internals >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: PHP 5.6 Support Timeline >> >> Zeev, >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote: >> > Following the initial discussion, I prepared an RFC that proposes to >> > extend the support periods for PHP 5.6: >> > >> > >> > >> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php56timeline >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks to Ferenc Kovacs and David Zuelke for reviewing it for any >> > glaring omissions. >> > >> > >> > >> > Let the discussion continue… >> >> I'd prefer it if the RFC took a stance and made a recommendation to one of >> the options. > > It does, perhaps not in a strong enough way: > "Further, given the 5.6 -> 7.0 upgrade is more difficult and time > consuming - our recommendation is option #1". > > I shuffled things around a bit to make it clearer. Let me know if that > answers your concern. Looks much better. Thank you. I still would rather see one vote (I have a thing against multiple vote options in general). If it gets denied, then we could do a different RFC with a different option. But having the stance being recommended is a good step forward. Thanks Anthony