Re: [VOTE] Contributor Guidelines, and Updates to Code of Conduct progress
| From: | David Zuelke | Date: | Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:17:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] Contributor Guidelines, and Updates to Code of Conduct progress | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-91158@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thanks for the work, Derick. Looks good!
(aaand I just top-replied :p)
> On 09.02.2016, at 13:33, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Things have quieted down around the Code of Conduct and Contributor
> Guidelines process, but I have not been sitting still. In the last week,
> the following things happened:
>
> - I had a call with the Drupal Community Working Group - as suggested by
> Larry Garfield. Stanislav was on the call as well.
>
> Take aways:
>
> - Texts should be void from ambiguity.
>
> - Although their CWG dealt with plenty of cases, no punitive action
> has occured as parties would often step back themselves. In most
> cases, a gently reminder was all that was necessary.
>
> - We should be reluctant to limit the scope of the Code of Conduct and
> Contributor Guidelines.
>
> - A Code of Conduct without *any* 'teeth' would not be beneficial.
>
> - We should start with suggesting/nominating people for the Mediation
> Team *before* deciding on the procedures and guidelines that
> they should mediate around. The underlaying reason is that if the
> team is known upfront, there ought to be more understanding for the
> general developer community. Or in other words, there should be no
> reason that "I would only put my friends on it".
>
> I do however have a few people in mind that I will reach out to
> privately, to see whether they are interested. If you have any
> suggestions for people that you consider reliable, considerate, and
> empathic, please reach out to them yourself, or let me know and I
> will.
>
> - The RFC text has seen a few updates as well.
>
> - @jessamynwest improved some of the text for "encouraged behaviour"
>
> https://github.com/derickr/php-community-health/commit/134670974b000483c2a179a02fc05a6d2de85d97
> - @hnrysmth imported some new phrases from the Contributor Covenant
> 1.4 over
>
> https://github.com/derickr/php-community-health/commit/8ca9fe70538b036a938acbafa5f5f27f91228602
> - @connerbw added a more general blurb about PHP and the commitment of
> the PHP team to be inclusive
>
> https://github.com/derickr/php-community-health/commit/e6c33f4b81975f2b2f27919e37c585322f829a1c
> - I combined the three bits of text around mailinglist posting
> guidelines into the Contributor Guidelines
>
> https://github.com/derickr/php-community-health/commit/7c55d1dd407524cdab593b885e6b3101bf590769
>
> I feel that the "Contributor Guidelines" are now in a reasonable shape
> to do a quick poll to gauge acceptability. As this is not a formal RFC
> vote, it's simply done through an online poll:
> http://twtpoll.com/y6hs4ndsfiki485
>
> Voting is non-binding, and will end at Friday February 12th, at noon
> UTC.
>
> Feel free to reply here with suggestions, comments, etc.
>
> cheers,
> Derick
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>