Re: Exceptions and Errors

> Your example is interesting. It shows an error that would be continuable > from an engine's point of view but not from the script's point of view. It > shows that there should not be any possibility to recover from exceptions > at the exact spot where the exception was thrown - anyway somthing that > violates the general exception idea (see Stanislav's mail on local stack > corruption...). Java has the concept of an "Error" (extended from Throwable which is extended to be Exception too) which "indicates serious problems that a reasonable application should not try to catch. Most such errors are abnormal conditions." Perhaps normal E_ERROR => Exception, and totally fatal errors => Error. You can catch Errors too, but it's specifically said that you really shouldn't try. Jevon