Re: [RFC Proposal] Null Coalesce Equal Operator
| From: | Pierrick Charron | Date: | Fri, 11 Mar 2016 04:47:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC Proposal] Null Coalesce Equal Operator | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-91627@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Sara,
Just to let you know that I took the liberty to correct the title of your
RFC. It was still null coalesce equal operator :)
Otherwise I'm +1 for both RFC
Pierrick
On 10 March 2016 at 22:01, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Midori Kocak <mtkocak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Let me introduce my first RFC here:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/null_coalesce_equal_operator >
> >
> I've jumped on the bandwagon by adding a second RFC related to this
> one: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short_ternary_equal_operator
> which
> focused on the short-ternary operator with the same goal of creating
> and assignment version of the operation.
>
> We can probably discuss them as a single concept since they relate to
> the same underlying principle (consistency in binary operations in the
> language), but I made it a separate RFC in case we want different
> voting or have different concerns regarding them.
>
> If that's a terrible idea, I can close the new one and let Midori add
> ?: to her original RFC.
>
> -Sara
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>