Re: [RFC Proposal] Null Coalesce Equal Operator

From: Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 04:47:44 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC Proposal] Null Coalesce Equal Operator
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-91627@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Sara, Just to let you know that I took the liberty to correct the title of your RFC. It was still null coalesce equal operator :) Otherwise I'm +1 for both RFC Pierrick On 10 March 2016 at 22:01, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Midori Kocak <mtkocak@gmail.com> wrote: > > Let me introduce my first RFC here: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/null_coalesce_equal_operator > > > > I've jumped on the bandwagon by adding a second RFC related to this > one: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short_ternary_equal_operator > which > focused on the short-ternary operator with the same goal of creating > and assignment version of the operation. > > We can probably discuss them as a single concept since they relate to > the same underlying principle (consistency in binary operations in the > language), but I made it a separate RFC in case we want different > voting or have different concerns regarding them. > > If that's a terrible idea, I can close the new one and let Midori add > ?: to her original RFC. > > -Sara > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.internals (#91627) next »