New HashTable implementation?

From: Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:04:44 +0000
Subject: New HashTable implementation?
Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-92911@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi all, Last June, it was briefly mentioned about changing PHP's string hash function [1] (DJB33 *seems* pretty horrible, after all, as far as collisions...). So 8 months ago I tried almost, if not, a half-dozen of them (including Murmur3) that were simple enough to quickly toss in. The result? In all cases, I believe, fewer instructions (in zend_hash_find, and the hashing function), BUT also a slight-to-small increase in cache misses in Wordpress and other scripts... And in a test filling an array with a million "string_$i" keys (high collision pattern for DJB33?), the speed was halved by the *huge* cache miss increase. :-/ I couldn't quite understand what was happening, where, if there were fewer collisions... Misses all spread out in the hash-array? So there didn't seem to be anything useful to gain there. Now, after seeing Bogdan's hash optimization idea last month [2], and reading Nikita's blog post again, I had some ideas I'd like to try -- assuming nobody else is planning major changes. :-) Besides Nikita, I'm addressing Dmitry and Xinchen because your names are on some minor hash items on the 7.1 ideas wiki [4]. I'm thinking of a Robin Hood implementation with Universal hashing [5] (of int keys and the string hashes). I haven't touched any code yet, but think I've worked out all the details in my head, and am ready to take a stab at it. I think it's fairly simple to get the basics working; and when I see how that goes, I can do the additional optimizations I have in mind that it allows (including reduced memory, on 64-bit at least). Question: Can I use zval.u1.v.reserved ? I guess I'll find out otherwise. :-O The string hash function itself is really a separate thing [6], but fasthash [7] (not to be confused with "superfast") looks like a good one that I missed before... After thinking about things, I think we could even keep/use a 64-bit hash on 32-bit arch. Well, just wanted to mention it first if anyone has a comment. :-) Should be interesting, but no idea how it'll perform (lookups should be very, very fast (upsizing also); but cache factors and inserts/deletes are wildcards). Wish me luck!? Thanks, Matt [1] https://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=143444845304138&w=2 [2] https://marc.info/?t=145744248100001&r=1&w=2 [4] https://wiki.php.net/php-7.1-ideas [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_hashing [6] https://github.com/rurban/smhasher [7] https://github.com/rurban/smhasher/blob/master/doc/fasthash64

« previous php.internals (#92911) next »