Re: Forbid dynamic calls to scope introspection/modification functions

Hi! > I think it's better to keep this email as RFC, at least for documentation of BC break > purpose. > I'm not sure if we need 2 week discussion + 2 weeks voting for this. > I think 1 week voting should be enough? It should be at least 2 weeks discussion, as it's a language change, as for voting, depends on when it happens. End of May, for example, has holidays in the US. But in general if RFC happens soon-ish, there's no reason to rush. And, of course, this does require an RFC - this is a substantial behavioral change that breaks BC (however weird the broken cases are). -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com