Re: Re: async/await - is future reserved words in PHP 7.x?

> I think we can spoonfeed the massive undertaking a bit by spreading it > across several iterations just to get things going. An idea I had was to > just begin by providing coroutines as part of the language. That would > include a \Coroutine class, as well as await / async keywords. > This would > at least enable third party async libraries to be more compatible since they > would have the same await types and semantics. > > The next step (or at the same time as the first) is to provide some sort of > \EventLoopInterface along with > > \EventLoop::getLoop(): \EventLoopInterface > \EventLoop::setLoop(\EventLoopInterface) > \EventLoop::run() > \EventLoop::stop() > \EventLoop::tick() > > To start out, just provide the internal coroutine scheduler as a default > implementation. Coroutines would use the "event loop" to schedule resumes. > > Doing so would allow even more interoperability if a library chose to > implement \EventLoopInterface in its event loop, where it > handles > coroutine scheduling (or lets it fall back to the internal one), and could > also provide I/O "extras". > > The final step would be to bring libuv into PHP, itself as a better default > implementation of \EventLoopInterface. > EventLoop interface, on development stage: https://github.com/async-interop/event-loop PHP wrappers for libev and libeio supported PHP 7. https://pecl.php.net/package/ev https://pecl.php.net/package/eio libuv - certainly better because it has everything you need and a huge community. Very need async/await in the PHP core (based on generators). Perhaps there are plans in core developers, for implement async/await?