Re: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Nullable Types

On 12/05/16 11:21, Davey Shafik wrote: > E.g. the behavior of passing executing with a null value for the > argument is something you should be consciously making a decision on, > and passing in null explicitly. I was actually getting the logic wrong... the problem with this proposal is that I HAVE to add the '?' for many of my libraries to continue to work simply because they do handle the null case. So what was a working system is broken by this change. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk