Re: Set object properties inline

On 01/06/16 22:09, Rasmus Schultz wrote: > This tendency to "defend" the dynamic side of the language, as though > static features were somehow an "attack" on dynamic features, befuddles me. > > These two sides of the language do not compete with each other - they > complement each other. That is perhaps what *I* am looking for. Being able to manage the attributes of a variable be it statically or dynamically defined should be identical. My 'attack' is that all the current discussions are on developing the static side without any mention of adding the same constraint system to a list of dynamic properties. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk