Re: How to indicate support for unimplemented part of an RFC
| From: | Leigh | Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:11:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: How to indicate support for unimplemented part of an RFC | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-93971@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 at 22:30 Matthew Browne <mbrowne83@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an
> official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future
> consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1" for covariant
> return types which are mentioned in passing in this RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/return_types.
I think you'd go ahead and create an RFC for it :)